Order quashing the subpoena to MIIA, August 3, 2015

U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · from GovInfo · 2 pages · 115 KB
open the file ↗ · original at the source ↗

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
JAMES ROSENCRANZ, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) CIVIL ACTION
) NO. 14-13050-JGD
JAMES A. FREEMAN, )
)
Defendant. ) 
SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER ON NON- 
PARTY’S MOTION TO QUASH AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 
On August 3, 2015, this court held a status conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(a) 
and a hearing to consider oral argument on the “Emergency Motion of Non -Party, MIIA
Property and Casualty Group, Inc., to Q uash Subpoena and for a Protective Order” (Docket No.
30). After consideration of the parties’ submissions and their oral arguments, it is hereby 
ORDERED as follows:
1. MIIA Property and Casualty Group’s motion to quash and for a protective order 
is ALLOWED.
a. As a courtesy, MIIA Property and Casualty Group shall provide the
plaintiff with the docket number of the harassment action that was
filed against the Winthrop Police Department.
b. As agreed, MIIA Property and Casualty Group shall provide a response
to Request No. 6 stating that Freeman did not participate in any risk
control or training services offered by the company.
c. No further information needs to be provided.
2. The parties shall comply with the following schedule: 
Case 1:14-cv-13050-JGD Document 41 Filed 08/03/15 Page 1 of 2

2
a. By August 17, 2015 , the plaintiff shall supplement his responses and 
produce documents responsive to the defendant’s document 
production requests. In addition, the plaintiff shall confirm whether
he intends to introduce medical evidence at trial.
b. Any motions to compel shall be filed by September 11, 2015 .
c. The plaintiff shall continue to search for the videotape requested by
the defendant. If he is able to locate it, he shall produce it to the
defendant.
d. The parties shall complete fact discovery by September 25, 2015 .
Any request for an extension of the discovery deadline shall include
an explanation as to why an extension is necessary.
/ s / Judith Gail Dein
Judith Gail Dein
United States Magistrate Judge
DATED: August 3, 2015 
Case 1:14-cv-13050-JGD Document 41 Filed 08/03/15 Page 2 of 2